PDA

View Full Version : Interesting Election Stats


SFjoey
11-03-2004, 07:28 PM
President Bush won a historic victory yesterday by defeating John Kerry by more than 3.5 million votes,

58.6 million to 55.1 million (51% to 48%) and winning the Electoral College 286 to 252. In doing so, President Bush:

• Becomes the first presidential candidate to win more than 50% of the popular vote since 1988.

• Received the most votes by any presidential candidate in history - over 58 million, even breaking President Reagan’s 1984 mark of 54.5 million votes.

• Becomes the first President re-elected while gaining seats in the House and the Senate since 1936, and the first Republican President to be re-elected with House and Senate majorities since 1924.

• Received a higher percentage of the popular vote than any Democratic presidential candidate since 1964.

• Garnered 7 million more popular votes than in 2000 - more than twice the amount that President Clinton increased his vote between 1992 and 1996.

• Increased his percent of the vote from 2000 in 45 out of 50 states, including a 4 percent increase in John Kerry’s home state of Massachusetts. President Bush ran just as strongly in the key battleground states as he did nationally. In the 14 most competitive states (AR, CO, FL, IA, MI, MN, MO, NH, NM, NV, OH, PA, WI, and WV), President Bush won 51% of the vote to John Kerry’s 49% -- an improvement of 2 points from his 2000 performance in those states. Yesterday also revealed that the Republican Party has made historic gains with minority voters and women. Exit polling revealed that President Bush won 42% of Hispanics (up from 35% in 2000), 11% of African-Americans (up from 9% in 2000), 24% of Jewish voters (up from 19% in 2000), and 47% of women (up from 43% in 2000). In Florida, 55% of Hispanic voters supported President Bush, an increase of 6 points from 2000. Just as we predicted, undecided and late-deciding voters went to the President Bush by a small margin. Despite media predictions that Kerry would win up to 90% of late-deciding voters, exit polling reveals that President Bush won voters who decided in the week before the election, 51% to 48%. Furthermore, as we predicted, yesterday was the first time in modern political history that an equal number of Republicans and Democrats turned out for a presidential election. The Democrats’ 4-point advantage in 2000 evaporated, with Republicans and Democrats both at 37% of the electorate in 2004.

On a strategic and tactical level, Bush-Cheney '04 and the Republican National Committee helped the President turnout a record number of Republicans and make historic gains among swing groups through an unprecedented volunteer grassroots organization and the most sophisticated advertising and voter contact strategy in campaign history: Some highlights include:

• Combining traditional shoe-leather grassroots outreach with an unprecedented online effort to build a network of millions of volunteers who spread the President’s message and helped turnout the vote on Election Day

• Employing cutting-edge research to efficiently target Republicans and Swing Voters through media buys and voter contact, the first time a presidential campaign utilized such research.

• Advertising heavily on national cable and radio to deliver the President’s message to both influentials and voters who had moved away from traditional broadcast TV, another first for a presidential campaign.

• Building new support among Hispanic and African American voters through local outreach, arned media, and specialty media buys.

• Delivering maps and directions to polling places to our committed supporters and using ophisticated, targeted Internet advertising in the closing days of the campaign to get out the ote.

SFjohnny
11-03-2004, 08:39 PM
wow, where do I start on this? What's the purpose of this exactly? Can anyone say "Sore Winners?"

58.6 million to 55.1 million (51% to 48%) and winning the Electoral College 286 to 252. In doing so, President Bush:

New Mexico and Iowa have yet to be called they are still officially too close to call” so the number is 274 to 252.

Received the most votes by any presidential candidate in history - over 58 million, even breaking President Reagan’s 1984 mark of 54.5 million votes.

uhhh…..Kerry got more than 54.5 million too. It was the largest turnout in history, of course they are going to get more than anyone else.

Becomes the first President re-elected while gaining seats in the House and the Senate since 1936, and the first Republican President to be re-elected with House and Senate majorities since 1924.

don’t think these stats have anything to do with Bush

Increased his percent of the vote from 2000 in 45 out of 50 states, including a 4 percent increase in John Kerry’s home state of Massachusetts. President Bush ran just as strongly in the key battleground states as he did nationally. In the 14 most competitive states (AR, CO, FL, IA, MI, MN, MO, NH, NM, NV, OH, PA, WI, and WV), President Bush won 51% of the vote to John Kerry’s 49% -- an improvement of 2 points from his 2000 performance in those states. Yesterday also revealed that the Republican Party has made historic gains with minority voters and women. Exit polling revealed that President Bush won 42% of Hispanics (up from 35% in 2000), 11% of African-Americans (up from 9% in 2000), 24% of Jewish voters (up from 19% in 2000), and 47% of women (up from 43% in 2000). In Florida, 55% of Hispanic voters supported President Bush, an increase of 6 points from 2000. Just as we predicted, undecided and late-deciding voters went to the President Bush by a small margin. Despite media predictions that Kerry would win up to 90% of late-deciding voters, exit polling reveals that President Bush won voters who decided in the week before the election, 51% to 48%. Furthermore, as we predicted, yesterday was the first time in modern political history that an equal number of Republicans and Democrats turned out for a presidential election. The Democrats’ 4-point advantage in 2000 evaporated, with Republicans and Democrats both at 37% of the electorate in 2004.

“Most Competitive states” what the hell does that mean? According to whom? According to how close it was? According to how many electoral votes they get? Kerry got California, New York, Michigan and you are naming West Virginia and New Hampshire?

Here are some “key stats” for Kerry (skewed for Democrats of course):

-Kerry received more votes than Bush did in 2000

-Kerry received more votes than any Republican Presidential candidate in the history of the United States (notice how I don’t say Democrats even though that is true too)

-Kerry received an astounding 56% of Hispanic votes, a whopping 80% of African American votes, 73% of Jewish votes and 53% of women (of course, according to the “exit polls” in which Kerry was also projected the winner, great source there).

-Kerry actually got more votes than anyone in any election in the history of the WORLD..........(before 2004.)

-Kerry won the majority of the Mid-West, notorious for working class Americans

-Kerry won the entire New England area, notorious for harboring most of the financial burden of the entire country

-Kerry won the whole West Coast, which is responsible for the most entertainment and highest electoral votes in the country.

-Kerry won New York City, the site of the worst terrorist attack in the history of the United States, the grounds of the state in which the new Patriotism started and Bush was supposedly "loved." A state in which the largest city, NYC's mayor is a republican and the most beloved mayor ever, Giulianni, was campaigning for Bush.

-Kerry won Washington DC in the largest landslide in the history of the district which plays home to the White House and harbors the heavily Republican government. He won it with a jawdropping 90% of the vote.

-In DC, Bush only received 17,689 more votes than Nader and only 18,362 more votes than the barely known Green Party Candidate David Cobb. This accounts for less than 9% of the difference that seperates Bush and Kerry in Ohio (of course, I'll fail to mention that Ohio is many times larger than DC)

and, as for the "strategic and tactical" stats. That's just blowing smoke up someone's ass. That is just a resume of facts of propaganda that cannot be proven, not that anyone would want to waste their time doing anyway. I guarantee you that Kerry can spat off 90% of those same things.

the election is over, no point in overselling your President. It's not going to sell me on anything. I just hope when you or your best friend are shipped off to war, it won't be to late to realize the error that is being made. I hope that when a small business or website that you or someone you know owns goes under because of Bush's tax cuts allowing big businesses more leverage to "compete" with small businesses, you will be there for them.

Misha
11-03-2004, 10:38 PM
Just what Bush needs, more hype to fuel his arrogance.




Here are some “key stats” for Kerry (skewed for Democrats of course):



You go, Johnny. But what's written in the yellow type?

SFjohnny
11-03-2004, 10:55 PM
You go, Johnny. But what's written in the yellow type?

just highlight it....