|
Submitted by Jeremy Hunt on Thursday, November 12, 2009 - 6:23PM
Title: 2012 Genre: Action/Adventure Starring: John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Thandie Newton, Oliver Platt, Danny Glover, Woody Harrelson Director: Roland Emmerich Studio: Sony Pictures Runtime: 158 mins In Theatres: November 13, 2009 MPAA Rating: Rating: () Grade: B All right folks, this one is a doozy. We’re talking end-of-the-world, danger around every corner (and continent), brought to us from the modern master of disaster himself, Roland Emmerich. Much like Transformers 2 from Michael Bay last year, if you don’t know what you’re getting into when it comes to a film from Emmerich, then you obviously haven’t been paying attention in class. We’re talking the man who brought us Stargate, Independence Day, Godzilla, The Day After Tomorrow, and 10,000 B.C. So we’re talking spectacle on a massive scale, with a so-so plot and not much regard for common sense. In other words, like Transformers (1 or 2; it really doesn’t matter), if you go into this movie with any expectations beyond being entertained at your most basic level of comprehension…well, you’re over-thinking it. This is everything Emmerich has ever done, only more. Seriously. My first thought coming out of the screening was, “That was The Day After Tomorrow times infinity.” All the destruction and crazy environmental madness that happened in TDAT is visited a hundred-fold on our globe in 2012. I mean we’re talking about the end of the world as we know it as “prophesied” by the Mayans a few thousand years ago. A little permafrost ain’t gonna cut it here, kiddos. And thus we have special effects on such a huge scale that it’s nearly incomprehensible…and a running time to match. This sucker is 2 hours and 40 minutes. Almost 3 hours of death and terrestrial dismemberment! It’s more than anyone could ever dared to hope for! You’ve got earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, crumbling earth crust, vehicular destruction, drownings, crushings, burninatings...the list goes on and on. To be fair, the effect work on display here is truly something to behold. It’s believable enough to be overwhelming by the time the story is over. Matter of fact, 2012 might be approved by the FDA at some point as a legit form of an explosion vaccine. I think I will be immune from here on out whenever I see another action sequence involving metal and combustible materials. You’ll notice I haven’t really said much about the story yet. Well, that’s mainly because I’m guessing you’re not going to this for the plot. It’s relatively simple: scientists discover that solar flares are turning neutrinos within the earth’s crust into mini-microwave ovens at an alarming rate and at an alarming intensity. Enough of these little suckers going “nuclear” and you’ve got a planet that’s liquefying its own surface. From there, we meet an incredibly large cast that is inexplicably (and somewhat miraculously) entangled as the flick moves along. Speaking of the cast, there are a number of very solid actors and actresses involved here. Their skills help give the film a minimal amount of gravitas, though they’re not really given a whole lot to work with here, not surprisingly. The script ranges from serviceable to downright clichéd, but again, did you expect anything else? In the end, 2012 is an over-the-top experience that pretty much demands that you see it in the theatre. Destruction on such an epic scale needs to be seen on a huge screen with a sound system to match. I guess the real question is: are you willing to submit yourself to such an experience for such a long time? If you are, no complaints are allowed when you finish. You knew what you were getting yourself into. |
Grade It!Amazon Block 1Recent Addi(c)tionsMovie News Monday, March 15, 2010 - 8:11PM Amazon Block 2YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE: |
Comments
2012
This movie is quite spectacular for the visual effects. I really enjoy it through out the 2.5+ hours long. Most scenes are predictable, but I still like them. The last part of the movie seems like a James Bond type movie with the same sophistication. I give this movie a B+.
2012
I have got to see this! It sounds spectacular. I remember sitting in the theater alone waiting for "Independence Day" to grace the screen. I had so much fun at that Saturday matinee. I know what I am doing with my birthday money!
2012
The movie was long, but unlike the other movies (Titanic, etc.) that are very long, there are no lulls in the action. Once the movie starts going, it is action the entire time. They threw in little details in the scenes lif you pay attention to the small things like somebody getting crushed by a car as they fall off the cliffor something. Talk about action, and explosions, and the detail. The theatre I saw it at needs to invest in some new sound equipment so that I could have fully experienced the shaking with the explosions. It is a must buy DVD for my collection.
The movie was long, but
The movie was long, but unlike the other movies the visual effects were well pair by a plot that did not have any lulls in the action. Once the movie starts, it is action packed the entire time. B+
Great Movie
I think that this movie started off a little slow, but once the action kicked in, it really kicked in and kept you on the edge of your seats for the entire show. I didn't realize how long the movie was and was suprised when we got out. You really don't realize how long you are in there because you become so engaged in what is happening in the movie. John Cusack played his role very well, loved the character that Woody Harrelson playes and he did it well. I was very impressed with the scenery and the action shots. I wouldn't recommend taking smaller children to it due to some of the graphic scenes.
Definately see it on the big screen!
Finally got to see this..
I thought this was much better than the "Day After Tomorrow". I think this show how far special effects have come. I did find the story line a bit weak. One thing that stands out is how a dad would take his kids into a restricted area and then not just look but stand in the middle of what looked like some very hot springs. I just found that to be a little unbelievable.
The scenes of destruction where unbelievable, and incredible to see what can be brought to the big screen now. Those were worth the trip to the movie.
Post new comment